Legal Opinion
Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 21, 2012No. 08-848CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUPPLEMENTARY OPINION
WIESE, Senior Judge.
This ease arises under the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (“NAHASDA” or “the statute”), as amended, 25 U.S.C. §§ 4101-4212 (2006). Plaintiffs sue here to recover grant funds originally paid to them under that statute, but later recaptured by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD” or “the agency”) when HUD determined that the allocation formula on which the grants had been based had been misapplied. Defendant has moved to dismiss count two of plaintiffs’ second amended complaint — a *624count alleging…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- City of Milwaukee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lummi Tribe of Lummi Reservation, Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Curran v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Modoc Lassen Indian Housing Authority v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Modoc Lassen Indian Housing Authority v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Crow Tribal Housing Authority v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.