Legal Opinion
Lummi Tribe of Lummi Reservation, Washington v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 12, 2017No. 2016-2196PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’Malley, Circuit Judge.
The government seeks review of a September 30, 2015 order of the Court of Federal Claims (the “Claims Court”). See Order, Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation v. United States, No. 08-848C (Fed. Cl. Sept. 30, 2015), ECF No. 121. In that order, the Claims Court reaffirmed its pri- or ruling that the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (“NAHASDA”) is money mandating, giving the Claims Court jurisdiction over appellees’ claims. Id. On June 9, 2016, this court granted the government’s petition for interlocutory appeal to “ensure that the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Columbus Regional Hospital v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- The Boeing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Boaz Housing Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- 112 Genesee Street, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2026
- 25-5150 Middle East Broadcasting Networks, Inc. v. USA; 25-5151 Radio Free Asia v. USA; 25-5158 RFE/RL, Inc. v. Kari Lake; & 25-5144 Patsy Widakuswara v. Kari LakeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.