Legal Opinion

Gunn v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1954No. Civ. 15750PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’DONNELL, J. pro tern. *

These two cases are presented on an agreed statement on appeal (rule 6a of Rules on Appeal) , which statement reads in part as follows:

“1. In 1948 the State Board of Equalization issued to Adam A. Schmierer an off-sale license to sell wine and beer (unrestricted as to alcoholic content) at the grocery store operated by Schmierer and located at 2775 Middlefield Road in the City of Palo Alto, County of Santa Clara, State of California. Previous to that time a similar license had been in effect for the prior operator of said store.
“2. Also in 1948 the State Board of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Artukovich v. AstendorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Gilgert v. Stockton Port DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. George v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Dahlbeck v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Raggio v. CampbellNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Peck's Liquors, Inc. v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Vanoli v. MunroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API