Legal Opinion
Peck's Liquors, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 1, 1963No. Civ. 21404PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.
Petition for writ of prohibition, mandamus, certiorari, or other writ, seeking to prohibit the superior court from enforcing an order requiring answers to certain questions in the taking of depositions.
QUESTIONS PRESENTED.
1. Is the petition proper?
2. Are petitioner’s witnesses subject to prosecution under the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act and therefore justified in *775refusing to answer on the ground of possible self-incrimination? This requires a determination of whether selling alcoholic beverages at less than the listed price is a crime.
RECORD.
George J. Kaplanis, real party in interest,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Oceanside Union School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. WhelchelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Peck's Liquors, Inc. v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.