Legal Opinion

Inso Corp. v. DEKOTEC HANDELSGES, mbH

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 26, 1998No. CIV.A. 97-12803-EFHPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HARRINGTON, District Judge.

This is a diversity action sounding in contract and tort which is before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Defendant has moved to dismiss the action for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Background

Plaintiffs Inso Corporation and Inso Chicago Corporation (“Inso”) develop and distribute file viewing technology for use in computer software. Inso’s headquarters are located in Boston, Massachusetts. Defendant Dekotec Handelsges, mbH (“Dekotec”) produces and distributes computer products. Dekotec is a German corporation with its principal place of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Ticketmaster-New York, Inc. v. Joseph M. AliotoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. Jacobson v. Mailboxes Etc. U.S.A., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Creighton Ltd. v. Government of QatarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  2. Provanzano v. Parker View Farm, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  3. Microfibres, Inc. v. McDevitt-AskewDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1998
  4. Stars for Art Production Fz, LLC v. Dandana, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  5. Confederate Motors, Inc. v. TernyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API