Legal Opinion
Friedlander v. Nims
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided September 30, 1983No. Civ. A. C82-1900APublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SHOOB, District Judge.
This is an action alleging (1) violation of federal securities laws, (2) violation of Georgia securities laws, (3) violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations law, and (4) breach of fiduciary duty under Georgia state law. The plaintiff, Herman Friedlander, sues individually and on behalf of a proposed class of persons who held non-controlling shares in Nimslo Technology, Inc. (“NTI”) which was, before its dissolution, a Georgia corporation. The defendants are persons and corporations who allegedly participated in and benefitted from fraudulent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,048 Milton E. Dupuy v. Clarence O. Dupuy, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- List v. Fashion Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Herman Friedlander, Etc., Cross-Appellees v. Jerry C. Nims, Timex Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Friedlander v. NimsDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984
- Tedesco v. MishkinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Friedlander v. Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman & AshmoreDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984
- Willamette Savings & Loan v. Blake & Neal Finance Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.