Legal Opinion
Friedlander v. Nims
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided April 17, 1984No. Civ. A. C82-1900APublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SHOOB, District Judge.
On September 30, 1983, the Court dismissed the claims against Timex Corporation subject to plaintiff’s right to amend within fifteen days. 571 F.Supp. 1188. Plaintiff did not amend the complaint within the time allowed. On January 6, 1984, the Court directed the entry of final judgment of dismissal as to Timex. After judgment was entered, Timex filed its bill of costs. Presently before the Court is the objection by plaintiff to Timex’s bill of costs.
Timex seeks the following costs:
Fees of court reporter $597.40
Fees for copies of papers 142.80
Docket fees 22.50
Computer…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Leftwich v. Harris-Stowe State CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Wehr v. Burroughs Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Independence Tube Corp. v. Copperweld Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Pitchford Scientific Instruments Corp. v. Pepi, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Wolfe v. WolfeDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Fressell v. AT & T Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984
- Corsair Asset Management, Inc. v. MoskovitzDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1992
- Frederick v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1995
- Houghton v. Sipco, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.