Legal Opinion
Willamette Savings & Loan v. Blake & Neal Finance Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 6, 1984No. Civ. 82-1507-PAPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PANNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Willamette Savings & Loan (“Willamette”) brings this action against Blake & Neal Finance Co. (“Blake & Neal”), its president, Norman Glenn (“Glenn”), and three John Does. Plaintiff alleges defendants violated the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq., the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., in a series of transactions involving the financing of retail purchases of mobile homes (“federal claims”). Plaintiff seeks a declaratory…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Medallion TV Enterprises, Inc. v. SelecTV of California, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1986
- Morley v. CohenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
- McLendon v. Continental Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.