Legal Opinion

DeMund v. Lum

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1984No. 9372; CIVIL NO. 49351PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HEEN, J.

John and Sonja Johnson (Johnsons) and Patricia Chong Lum (Lum), defendants-appellants (collectively Appellants), appeal from a judgment entered on April 8, 1983, in favor of Robert and Elizabeth DeMund (DeMunds), plaintiffs-appellees, enjoining Appellants from violating a restrictive covenant in the deeds to their properties. Johnsons also appeal from a subsequent order entered on November 23, 1983, holding them in contempt of court for violating the injunction. We affirm the trial court except for the award of attorney’s fees. The appeals will be discussed…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Howat v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Food Pantry, Ltd. v. Waikiki Business Plaza, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Waugh v. University of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Southampton Civic Club v. CouchTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Smothers v. RenanderHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pancakes of Hawaii, Inc. v. Pomare Properties Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. LeMay v. LeanderHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Azer v. MyersHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Bjornen v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Pelosi v. Wailea Ranch EstatesHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API