Legal Opinion

Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Zipes

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 22, 1989No. 88-608PublishedCited by 316 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

Section 706(k) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U. S. C. §2000e-5(k), provides in relevant part that a “court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the [Equal Employment Opportunity] Commission or the United States, a reasonable attorney’s fee as part of the costs.” In this case we must determine under what circumstances § 706(k) permits a court to award attorney’s fees against in-tervenors who have not been found to have violated the Civil Rights Act or any other federal law.

I—

This controversy began in 1970 when respondents, female flight attendants of Trans World…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by316 opinions

  1. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Avera v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

311 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API