Legal Opinion · Dissent

Personhuballah v. Alcorn

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided March 3, 2017No. Civil No. 3:13-cv-678Published

1DissentPayne, Senior District Judge

I agree with the quantum of fees and costs27 awarded in the majority opinion as against the Defendants before they abandoned the defense of the redistricting statute at issue in this case. However, I do not agree that the Intervenor-Defendants are liable for any fees because, as explained below, I understand the Supreme Court’s decision in Indep. Fed’n of Flight Attendants v. Zipes, 491 U.S. 754, 109 S.Ct. 2732, 105 L.Ed.2d 639 (1989) to foreclose such an award against the Intervenor-Defen-dants. Thus, I respectfully dissent from that part of the majority opinion.

I

In Zipes, the Supreme Court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. ZipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Rum Creek Coal Sales, Inc. v. CapertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  5. Planned Parenthood Of Central New Jersey v. * The Attorney General Of The State Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API