Starkey v. Philadelphia
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bell,
The plaintiffs, instituted this action in Equity in which they claimed a reversionary interest in certain lands taken by the City in eminent domain proceedings.
The plaintiffs contended that the City never acquired a fee simple title but only a base or determinable fee; that the lands were condemned for airport purposes and are now not used for airport or any other public purpose; that the City now proposes to convey the lands to private persons for private industrial purposes and has therefore abandoned any public use of these lands; and that the limited or base fee…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Dornan v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- London v. KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Slegel v. LauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Parks v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re The Appeal of Neshaminy Auto Villa Ltd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Basehore v. Hampden Industrial Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Captline v. County of AlleghenyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Fleck v. Universal-Cyclops Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- In re Condemnation by the Commonwealth, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.