Legal Opinion

Parks v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1930No. Appeals, 128, 129 and 130PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

These three actions of ejectment involve the title to three parcels of land situate between low watermark of the Kiskiminetas River and State Highway Route No. 66, in Parks Township, Armstrong County, in this State. By agreement of the parties, the cases were tried without the filing of the declaration, answer and abstracts of title required by the Act of May 8, 1901, P. L. 142, 143, and its amendments of June 7, 1915, P. L. 887, and June 12, 1919, P. L. 478. This course would not have been objectionable if the agreement had set forth all the matters required by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wright v. GuierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
  2. Adams v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Borough of Harrisburg v. CrangleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
  4. Kreamer v. YoneidaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Bear Valley Coal Co. v. DewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Sutton v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Conneaut Lake Park, Inc. v. KlingensmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Niles v. Fall Creek Hunting Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Inn Le'Daerda, Inc. v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. A. D. Graham & Co. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API