Legal Opinion

Porter v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1953No. 32089PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, C. J.

Actions which were consolidated for the purpose of trial were instituted by Allen W. Porter, as administrator of the estate of Alice G. Buckman, deceased, and June Fors against the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company to recover damages arising out of a collision between an automobile being driven by Alice G. Buck-man and a railroad boxcar propelled by the defendant. The cases were tried before a jury. A verdict for the defendant was returned. The court denied motions for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial and entered judgments dismissing the actions.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Hill v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Tonning v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Watson v. Northern Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Hopp v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Kent v. WhitakerWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Porter v. CHICAGO M. ST. P. & PR CO.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Hewitt v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. O'Dell v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API