Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 7, 2009No. 01C50641; A118029PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

This case is on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, which vacated our prior decision, State v. Rodriguez (Rodriguez I), 201 Or App 94, 116 P3d 923 (2005), in light of State v. Ramirez, 343 Or 505, 173 P3d 817 (2007), adh’d to as modified on recons, 344 Or 195, 179 P3d 673 (2008). State v. Rodriguez, 345 Or 316, 195 P3d 63 (2008). In Rodriguez I, we vacated defendant’s sentences and remanded for resentencing because we agreed with defendant’s unpreserved contention that the trial court had violated the principles subsequently announced in Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. FultsOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. RamirezOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API