Legal Opinion
In re Albert
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin (Charles B.), J.
After a bitter contest as to duty to arbitrate, the parties finally went to arbitration and an award was made. The award orders the respondent to pay a certain sum of money, forty-eight dollars. As to that there is no relief asked. The contract is one whereby the defendant agreed to employ only union labor. The award orders respondent to live up to the contract. Respondent says that the judgment of the court will take the form of a mandatory injunction and that such a judgment cannot be founded on facts found by arbitration. That is not the rule to be followed.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Susquehanna Steamship Co. v. A. O. Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pocketbook Workers Union, Local 1 v. Centra Leather Goods Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1956
- Donato v. American Locomotive Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- In re the Arbitration between Young & DeschlerNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- In re the Arbitration between Staklinski & Pyramid Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
- In re the Arbitration between Staklinski & Pyramid Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958