Legal Opinion
Eysenbach v. Naharkey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 13, 1926No. 13931PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRANSON, Y. C. J.
The motion to modify the opinion filed December 16, 1924, in effect represents for further consideration the entire record, ¡and the positions of the respective parties.
iSammie Naharkey sued W. E. Hardesty in the district court of Tulsa county, alleging that he was the legal and equitable owner of an undivided three-fourths interest in the east half of the northeast quarter of the southwest quartér; and the east half of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of section twenty-six (26) township nineteen (19) north, range twelve (12) east, in said county.
O. K. Eysenbach…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coleman v. BattiestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Ardmore Coal Co. v. BevilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Chapple v. GidneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Leak Glove Manuf'g Co. v. NeedlesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Gidney v. ChappelSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Naharkey v. Sand Springs HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Sartin v. HughenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Latimer v. VandersliceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- King v. BeallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934