Scott v. Lipman & Katz, P.A.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
*971LIPEZ, Justice.
Susan and Roscoe Scott (the “Scotts”), individually and on behalf of their minor child, appeal from the Superior Court’s (Knox County, Chandler, J.) denial of their motion for relief from its order approving an infant settlement and attorney fees. M.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Lipman and Katz, PA., (“Lipman”) argues 1) that the appeal is untimely, 2) that the Rule 60(b) motion was untimely, and 3) that the trial court did not err in denying the Scotts’ Rule 60(b) motion. We vacate the orders of the trial court denying 60(b) relief and approving the attorney fees.
Background
The Scotts…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Reville v. RevilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Franklin Property Trust v. Foresite, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Merrill v. MerrillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Chadwick-BaRoss, Inc. v. Martin Marietta Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Kolmosky v. KolmoskySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Geyerhahn v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- McCarthy v. U.S.I. Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Madore v. Maine Land Use Regulation CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Berg v. BragdonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Biette v. Scott Dugas Trucking & Excavating, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.