Legal Opinion

Madore v. Maine Land Use Regulation Commission

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 17, 1998PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAUFLEY, Justice.

[¶ 1] Armand S. and Kathleen G. Madore appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Alexander, J.) dismissing their complaint for lack of standing. On appeal, the Madores argue that the court erred in concluding that they lacked standing to litigate their M.R.Civ.P. 80C appeal and federal Fair Housing Act claim, and erred in denying their requests for reconsideration. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment.

[¶ 2] In December 1995, the Madores applied to the Maine Land Use Regulation Commission for approval to develop “Western Maine Academy,” a residential…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Scott Coon v. Robert P. GrenierCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. Walsh v. City of BrewerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  5. Halfway House, Inc. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. John Doe I v. Robert WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  2. Homeward Residential, Inc. v. Marianne A. GregorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  3. Heidi Pushard v. Bank of America N.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  4. Medeika v. WattsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  5. Geyerhahn v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API