Legal Opinion

Mark Twain Kansas City Bank v. Kroh Bros. Development

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 21, 1990No. 64,489PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Briscoe, J.:

Continental Construction Engineers (Continental) and Joseph J. Furman and Lawrence H. Furman, P.C., (Furman) appeal the district court’s decision that they were not entitled to mechanics’ liens against mortgaged property on which Mark Twain Kansas City'Bank (Bank) foreclosed. We affirm.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. In 1986, Kroh Brothers Development Co. (Kroh) executed two promissory notes to the Bank, secured by separate mortgages on the Krohs’ property. In anticipation of construction of a retail shopping area on the mortgaged property, the Krohs contracted with…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Director of Taxation v. Kansas Krude Oil Reclaiming Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Danes v. St. David's Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  3. Goebel v. National Exchangors, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Kansas Mortgage Co. v. WeyerhaeuserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  5. Lentz Plumbing Co. v. FeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Haz-Mat Response, Inc. v. Certified Waste Services Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. Kilner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. Security Benefit Life Insurance v. Fleming Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  4. Mutual Savings Ass'n v. Res/Com Properties, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2003
  5. Haz-Mat Response, Inc. v. Certified Waste Services Ltd.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API