Legal Opinion

State v. Weist

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1986No. TC 10-84-08687; CA A36625; SC S33052PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.

The chief issue presented by this and a companion case also decided today, State v. Weist, 302 Or 379, 730 P2d 25 (1986), is whether Oregon law permits a magistrate to issue a warrant to search a motor vehicle for evidence that it had been unlawfully registered, an “infraction” under the motor vehicle code, former ORS 481.130 {repealed by Or Laws 1983, ch 338, § 978). The Court of Appeals reversed an order of the circuit court suppressing evidence seized under a second warrant obtained in consequence of such a search, State v. Weist, 79 Or App 808, 720 P2d 755 (1986), and defendant petitioned…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Nelson v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. BridewellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. AFSCME Local 2623 v. Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. EsplinOregon Supreme Court · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API