Legal Opinion

Harter v. Lenmark

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 4, 1989No. C3-88-401PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

On the petition of Voight Lenmark, individually and as the personal representative of the estate of Catherine Lenmark, we review a court of appeals decision affirming summary judgment in favor of the respondent Elsie Harter, as trustee, in this action to foreclose mortgages and obtain deficiency judgments. 428 N.W.2d 596. The trial court determined that demand letters addressed to Voight Lenmark individually were sufficient to put him, in his capacity as personal representative, on notice of the demand for payment from Catherine’s estate. The trial court also entered summary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peterson v. MarstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Harter v. LenmarkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lampton v. LaHoodCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Beach First National Bank v. Estate of GurnhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. In Re Estate of BeiderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Estate of Lane v. Qik N EZ Properties, L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API