Legal Opinion

Murray v. Zook

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1933No. 26,275PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

This is an action by the appellant, who is the owner of real and personal property in Milford Township, LaGrange County, seeking an injunction against the appellee, James E. Zook, as auditor of LaGrange County from extending o-n the tax duplicate of -said county any assessment of taxes against the property of the appellant or that of any other person in said township in excess of an amount as determined by a rate of «$1.50 thereon and that he be enjoined from delivering to the treasurer of said county the tax duplicate bearing any assessment against plaintiff’s property or the property of any…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Platter v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Lutz v. City of CrawfordsvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Garrigus v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Follett v. Sheldon, Treas.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Kitchel v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Marion Superior Court, Civil Division, Room No. 5Indiana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hunt v. NortonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Yoselowitz v. Peoples Bakery, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. In Re the Estate of CassnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Simmons v. WoodwardIndiana Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API