Legal Opinion

Lutz v. City of Crawfordsville

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1887No. 13,595PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, C.

J.—The thirteenth subdivision of section 3106 of the statutes provides that a city shall have power “To regulate and license all inns, taverns, or other places-used or kept for public entertainment; also all shops or’ other places kept for the sale of articles [liquors] to be used, in and upon the premises.”

Section 3154 provides that the common council shall have1 jurisdiction, among other things, “to exact license-money from all persons licensed to retail intoxicating liquors by county or State authority; and to regulate all places where intoxicating liquors are sold to be used oh…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Humphries v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hedderich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Robinson v. SchenckIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. State v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  5. Smith v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. EdgertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. State ex rel. Western Construction Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Robinson v. RippeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API