Legal Opinion

Garrigus v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1901No. 19,119PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From Hamilton. Circuit Court; J. F. Neal, Judge. Action by Milton Garrigus against the board of county commissioners to recover for services of expert accountants in examination of certain public records. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

This was an action upon an agreement in writing made by the board of commissioners of Howard county with two expert accountants for services to be performed by the latter in the examination of certain public records and accounts, and the collection of such sums of money as might be found due to the county. The suit was commenced in the Howard Circuit Court, and the venue was changed to the county of Hamilton. The board filed a demurrer to the complaint for want of facts, and it was sustained. Error is assigned upon this decision.

The material allegations of the complaint were these: Errors…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henderson v. State ex rel. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hoffman v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Board of Commissioners v. GardnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Duncan v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Board of Commissioners v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Workman v. GoldthaitIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Von Rosenberg v. LovettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Roper v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Fancher v. Board of CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Leathem & Co. v. Jackson CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API