Purcell v. Victor Power & Mining Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The action involves the title and right of possession to certain real estate described as lots 1 and 2 of the town of Harrison Gulch, in Shasta County, said lots being a part or portion of the Bonanza lode mining claim, of which the defendant is the owner.
The amended complaint is in two counts, the first of which, after alleging that “for more than five years last past the plaintiff, by and through his grantors and predecessors in interest, has been the owner of and entitled to the possession of the real property” above referred to, charges that the “defendant, wrongfully and without right,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Foster v. Richard BusteedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Eversdon v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Long v. DollarhideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Houchin Sales Co. v. AngertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- In Re Mercury Engineering, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
- Guardianship of LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.