Legal Opinion
Spencer v. Arnold
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 20, 1931No. 21144PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.
The alleged acts of trespass were: The dispossession of the plaintiff on two occasions under the claimed authority of writs of assistance issued in an action 'involving her land, to which she was not a party; an assault and battery; and a wrongful arrest in an attempt to eject her from the premises.
It was undisputed that the land was allotted to Richard Arnold, the husband of the plaintiff, and that the land had been the homestead of Richard Arnold and the plaintiff up to the time of his death, about a year prior to the dispossession, and that it continued to be the homestead of the plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Terrell v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Rhyne v. TurleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Jones Leather Co. v. WoodySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Williams v. BaldreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Reed v. FichencordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Frank Chavez v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, a New York Corporation, Rolando Garza Zarate v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Neil v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Advantor Capital Corp. v. YearyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Gore v. TaylorCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
- Beneficial Finance Co. of Tulsa v. WienerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.