Legal Opinion
Reed v. Fichencord
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 23, 1923No. 11297PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
This action was commenced by the defendants in error against the plaintiffs in error to recover damages sustained by the defendants in • error for the wrongful taking of personal property of the defendants in error by the plaintiffs in error. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants, as they appeared in the trial court.
It is first contended by the defendants that the court should have instructed a verdict for the defendants because the defendants tendered to the plaintiffs the sum of $49.50, which represented the nét earnings ’ from the property which, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scott v. Vulcan Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Fulsom-Morris Coal & Mining Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Rhyne v. TurleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ClampittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Bass v. the City of AtokaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sopkin v. Premier Pontiac, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- State ex rel. Pollution Control Coordinating Board v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Spencer v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Queen Ins. Co. of America v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Thompson v. BurnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.