Legal Opinion
Advantor Capital Corp. v. Yeary
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 18, 1998No. 96-6400, 96-6408 and 97-6106PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Defendants James Yeary and Sonitrol of Oklahoma City, Inc., appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for judgment as a matter of law on plaintiff Advantor Capital Corporation’s fraud and abuse of process claims, and the court’s entry of judgment on those claims. Advantor cross-appeals the court’s denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law on defendants’ counterclaim. 1 We affirm.
I
In December 1986, Sonitrol Financial Corporation and its parent, Sonitrol Corporation, commenced case No. 86-2703-A against Sonitrol of Oklahoma City, Inc., in federal…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Robert Lewis v. B.F. Goodrich Company Daniel Newsome Roy AilstockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Wolfgang v. Mid-America Motorsports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Faulkenberry v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Perez v. El Tequila, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Guides, Ltd. v. Yarmouth Group Property Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AGDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Vanover v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.