Legal Opinion

Roe v. Doe 1

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 2024No. F086315Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 12/20/23; Certified for Publication 1/9/24 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JOHN GM ROE, F086315 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 22CECG04204) v. DOE 1 et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Jonathan M. Skiles, Judge. Nye, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet and Timothy C. Hale for Plaintiff and Appellant. No appearance for Defendants and Respondents. -ooOoo- Plaintiff John GM Roe1 filed a childhood sexual assault action against three “Doe” defendants. He…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. City of Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles Employee Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Doe v. San Diego Imperial CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API