Legal Opinion
Leidig v. Honeywell, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 4, 1994No. 3-92 CIV 544PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALSOP, Senior District Judge.
This matter came before the Court on January 21, 1994, on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. In this employment discrimination action, John Leidig alleges that Honeywell, Inc., (“Honeywell”) discriminated against him on the basis of his age. Honeywell argues that it is entitled to summary judgment because each of Leidig’s claims fail as a matter of law.
I. BACKGROUND
The defendant, Honeywell, is a publicly-owned company involved in, among other things, providing products and services for aviation and space businesses. The aviation and space business…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- M.L. v. MagnusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Bruchas v. Preventive Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Smith v. DataCard Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Mandy v. Minnesota Mining & ManufacturingDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- D.W. v. Radisson Plaza Hotel RochesterDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.