Legal Opinion

State v. Fairclough

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1935No. 5510PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLAND, Justice.

Defendant was convicted of mayhem alleged to have been committed August 28,' 1932, by willfully and maliciously slitting the nose of Mrs. Harvel Maxwell. A motion for a new trial was made and overruled and the defendant sentenced to an indeterminate term in the State Prison. Numerous errors have been assigned on this appeal, but these may be grouped into four classes, as follows: First, the defendant was denied his constitutional right to a fair and impartial trial, in that he was denied the assistance of counsel; second, that the court failed in its instructions properly to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Commonwealth v. O'KeefeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. State Ex Rel. Tucker v. DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Yates v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Cruthirds v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. HartmanUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State v. MathisUtah Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API