State v. Green
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLAND, Justice.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of forgery and appeals. Thirty-two alleged errors have been assigned and are relied on. Many of them can be grouped together in our discussion of them. The facts are not complicated and may be briefly stated. On December 18, 1934, the defendant went to Auerbach’s Store in Salt Lake City and purchased a small tea set. The amount of the purchase was $3.01. Payment was by check for $25.50, a copy of which is hereinafter set out. Defendant was given the balance in money. The check was false and forged. The name signed was Dr. W. L. Gardner,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- People v. DoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Commonwealth v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- State v. KeehnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- People v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Thomas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. PrettymanUtah Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. Beltran-FelixCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
- State v. GorhamUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. WellardUtah Supreme Court · 1955
- Lundgreen v. LundgreenUtah Supreme Court · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.