Legal Opinion

Miller v. Campbell, Warburton, Fitzsimmons, Smith, Mendel & Pastore

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 2008No. H030965PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, J.

Defendant Campbell, Warburton, Fitzsimmons, Smith, Mendel & Pastore (Campbell Warburton) is a law firm that had represented plaintiff Reiko Miller in connection with her duties as the executor of her mother’s estate. At the conclusion of that matter, Campbell Warburton requested its attorneys’ fees from the probate court and was awarded all but one category of the fees it sought. The probate court’s major reason for denying that one category of fees was its finding that the fees had been generated by services rendered to Miller personally, not as the executor of the estate.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Amtower v. Photon Dynamics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Huskinson & Brown, Limited Liability Partnership v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Estate of GilkisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. In Re Estate of HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Children's Hospital Central California v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Pellegrini v. WeissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Cotta v. County of KingsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
  4. Strong v. BeydounCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Buesa v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API