Legal Opinion
Strong v. Beydoun
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 19, 2008No. G039758PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
Kathleen Strong appeals from the judgment of dismissal entered after a demurrer to her complaint against Ali Beydoun and Edwin Craig Sheldon for attorney fees was sustained without leave to amend. Strong’s complaint sought recovery under the theories of quantum meruit and unjust enrichment for the reasonable value of legal services she rendered for Beydoun and Sheldon under a fee-sharing agreement with Attorney Bill Suojanen. Strong also sued for declaratory relief. The trial court found that rule 2-200 of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar (Rule 2-200)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Huskinson & Brown, Limited Liability Partnership v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Chambers v. KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Miller v. Campbell, Warburton, Fitzsimmons, Smith, Mendel & PastoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Margolin v. ShemariaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
3Cited by7 opinions
- Olsen v. HarbisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Fair v. BakhtiariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Official Comm. Unsecured Creditors of HH Liquidation, LLC v. Comvest Grp. Holdings, LLC (In re HH Liquidation, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- Alioto v. HoilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Alioto v. HoilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.