Legal Opinion

Calculagraph Co. v. Wilson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided March 18, 1905No. 2,064PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Equity. In the matter of petition for attachment for contempt.

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, District Judge.

This case now comes before the court upon a rule to show cause on a petition for attachment for contempt, brought by the complainant against the defendant. This court, in 132 Fed. 20, had before it the question of the validity of the patents in suit and of their infringement. The court ordered a decree to be entered for the complainant, for an injunction, and for an accounting. A preliminary injunction had already been decreed by the court. Defendant is charged with violating both the preliminary and the final injunctions. The affidavits brought before us show that since…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Calculagraph Co. v. WilsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Remington Cash Register Co. v. National Cash Register Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1925
  2. Metallizing Engineering Co. v. B. Simon, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1945
  3. McIlhenny Co. v. BulliardDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1928
  4. Queen & Co. v. GreenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Englander Spring Bed Co. v. TrounstineDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API