Legal Opinion

Bate Refrigerating Co. v. Gillett

United States Circuit Court

Decided April 30, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Motion for attachment for contempt.

1Opinion of the CourtWales, J.

The defendants, Benjamin W. Gillett, Morillo Tí. Gillett, and David II. Sherman, were enjoined from infringing letters patent Ho. 187,314, of November 20, 1877, by a decree of this court, made on the fourteenth day of November, 1881. The injunction was dissolved on September 28, 1882, and reinstated March 29, 1884; and on April 10, 1884, the writ was re-served on the defendants, with the exception of David II. Sherman, who, it is proved, had actual notice of the order and of the existence of the writ. In obedience to the injunction, they immediately ceased to make use of the complainant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Cotton-Tie Supply Co. v. McCreadyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1879
  2. Whipple v. HutchinsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1858
  3. Phillips v. DetroitU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Water Co. v. American Strawboard Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1896
  2. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super MarketsDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1954
  3. Queen & Co. v. GreenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API