Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Selmser

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1927No. Docket No. 4916PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLUCAS, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment rendered for defendant in a suit brought for the recovery of a real estate commission.

Plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement on February 6, 1923, which recited that the plaintiff had made a sale to Frank G. Miller of a property known as the Cannon ranch, for a consideration of $32,500, and for the first payment on which Miller deeded his $6,000 equity in a five-acre lemon orchard at Lemon Grove, leaving a balance due on the Cannon ranch of $26,500, which Miller agreed to pay, with six per cent interest payable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dunne v. ColombCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Irwin v. KlimperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Hargrave v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cousins Investment Co. v. Hastings Clothing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. In Re Eastview Estates Ii, Debtor. Perry T. Christison, Trustee for Eastview Estates II v. The Norm Ross Company and Eli Perlman Realty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Dallas Dome Wyoming Oil Fields Co. v. BrooderWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Langford v. King Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. Craig v. MargraveNevada Supreme Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API