Legal Opinion

Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. Swanson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 7, 1987No. C2-86-1728Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Respondents Hermels, as sellers on a contract for deed, were parties defendant to an action brought by appellant insurance company. The insurance company wanted to avoid payment on a fire loss to defendants, the Swansons, who were the contract for deed buyers. Appellant wanted to avoid payment on the grounds of fraud and material misrepresentation. After a jury verdict in appellant’s favor, the trial court awarded judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of the Swansons in the full amount of the applicable insurance binder limits. That judgment was ultimately…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Howe v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Hogs Unlimited v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API