Goodwin v. Wulfenstein
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
Three unsuccessful plaintiffs in a civil fraud suit have asked us to decide whether the jury was adequately instructed and whether its verdict was supported by the evidence. By cross appeal the defendants have challenged the trial court’s refusal to award them attorney fees. For reasons explained below, we uphold the verdict and the denial of attorney fees.
This suit was brought by a group of investors — B.R. Goodwin, Veri Goodwin and Les Hanson — who lost money in a transaction by which they had hoped to acquire interests in two Montana mines. The purported owner and seller of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Viehweg v. ThompsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Quincy v. JOINT SCHOOL DIST. NO. 41, ETC.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Allan D. Campbell v. Mandy Lea ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Joyce Bros. v. StanfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
- Harper v. JohannesenIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ross v. Coleman Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Beale v. SpeckIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
- City of Idaho Falls v. Beco Const. Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Toews v. FunkIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
- City of Idaho Falls v. Beco Const. Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.