Legal Opinion

City of Idaho Falls v. Beco Const. Co., Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1993No. 18495Published

Idaho Falls, September 1992 Term.

1Opinion of the Court

850 P.2d 165 (1993)

123 Idaho 516

CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross Respondent,

v.

BECO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a corporation, Defendant-Respondent-Cross Appellant.

No. 18495.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Idaho Falls, September 1992 Term.

February 2, 1993.

Rehearing Denied May 4, 1993.

Anderson, Pike & Bush, Idaho Falls, for plaintiff-appellant-cross respondent. Dale W. Storer argued.

Fuller, Carr & Parry, Idaho Falls, for defendant-respondent-cross appellant. Mark R. Fuller argued.

BISTLINE, Justice.

In May of 1985, the city of Idaho Falls (hereinafter the "City")…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Graves v. CupicIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Houghland Farms, Inc. v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Perkins v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Robertson v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API