Legal Opinion
Allan D. Campbell v. Mandy Lea Clark
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 1, 1960No. 6461PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
The general nature of this action to recover damages arising out of a traffic accident was stated on a former appeal, Campbell v. Clark, 10 Cir., 271 F.2d 578; and no useful purpose would be served by stating it anew. On a trial after remand of the case, the court instructed the jury respecting the burden of proof, negligence, contributory negligence, proximate cause, sudden emergency, unavoidable accident, rules of the road, witnesses, expert witnesses, and damages. As on the first trial, the jury returned a verdict for the defendant; judgment was entered on the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Benz v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Murray Grayson and Southern Freightways, Inc., a Corporation v. Earold E. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Meneley v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- E. L. Farmer & Company, a Corporation v. Marshall W. Hooks and American Motorists Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Charles W. Padgett v. Buxton-Smith Mercantile Company and Floyd R. EhrmannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- J.C. Booth v. Peavey Company Commodity ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Ruth C. Krizak and John M. Krizak v. W. C. Brooks & Sons, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Gardner v. PereboomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Howard v. StoughtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Staudinger v. Sooner Pipe & Supply CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.