Legal Opinion

Maddison Dual Fuels, Inc. v. Southern Union Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided May 22, 1997No. 13-95-494-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RODRIGUEZ, Justice.

Maddison Dual Fuels, Inc. (“Maddison”) appeals from a no-answer default judgment which resulted after Maddison failed to answer in a suit for breach of a purchase agreement. We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

Southern Union Co. (“Southern”) made a purchase order to Maddison for 123 fuel conversion kits to be used by the Rio Grande Valley School Districts for converting school bus engines to run on natural gas. In that purchase order, Southern specified that

Equipment orders from each district will be processed by Southern Union Gas and forwarded as delivery requests to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. McKanna v. EdgarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Schlipf v. Exxon Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hanover Modular Homes of Taft, Inc. v. Corpus Christi Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. RWL Construction, Inc. v. Erickson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ingram Industries, Inc. v. U.S. Bolt Manufacturing, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  2. BLS Development, LLC v. Manuel Lopez, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2012
  3. National Multiple Sclerosis Society—North Texas Chapter v. Rice, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2000
  4. Katy Venture, LTD & Katy Management, L.L.C. v. Cremona Bistro Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  5. BLS Development, LLC v. Manuel Lopez, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API