Legal Opinion

Ingram Industries, Inc. v. U.S. Bolt Manufacturing, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 2, 2003No. 01-01-00679-CVPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIM TAFT, Justice.

Appellant, Ingram Industries, Inc. (Ingram Industries), takes a restricted appeal from a default judgment rendered in favor of appellee, U.S. Bolt Manufacturing, Inc. (U.S. Bolt). We address (1) whether U.S. Bolt exercised reasonable diligence in seeking to serve Ingram Industries before resorting to substituted service, (2) whether U.S. Bolt was required to comply strictly with Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 106 in issuing and serving citation upon Ingram Industries, and (3) whether the face of the record shows that the trial court properly awarded U.S. Bolt damages.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Texas Commerce Bank, National Ass'n v. NewTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Paramount Pipe & Supply Co. v. MuhrTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Quaestor Investments, Inc. v. State of ChiapasTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Novosad v. Cunningham, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  5. Conseco Finance Servicing v. Klein Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Marrot Communications, Inc. v. Town & Country Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  2. Paramount Credit Inc., D/B/A 5 Star Autoplex v. Kimberly Montgomery, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  3. Clear Lake Center, L.P. v. Garden Ridge, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  4. BLS Development, LLC v. Manuel Lopez, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2012
  5. NETCO, INC. v. Montemayor, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API