Legal Opinion

Bristol v. Hershey

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1908No. Civ. No. 458PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the superior court of Los Angeles county in favor of defendant rendered upon a hearing sustaining the demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend.

It appears from the second amended complaint that on August 1, 1902, defendant Hershey obtained a decree foreclosing a first mortgage executed by plaintiff on certain real estate, in which proceeding one Wills, the holder of a junior mortgage, was made a party, but to whom no affirmative relief was granted by the decree; that under this decree, on September 24, 1902, the premises were sold…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Pollard v. HarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Cameron v. BurnhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. White v. CostiganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Malvaney v. YagerMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Kaiser v. MansfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Dipple v. NevilleMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Bechtel v. BaglietoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Kaiser v. MansfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API