Legal Opinion
Cameron v. Burnham
California Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1905No. S.F. No. 3551PublishedCited by 13 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
This action is brought to obtain a decree that plaintiff is the owner of a one-ninth interest in a subterranean gold-beáring gravel channel upon a certain tract of land in Sacramento County and for j an accounting of all dealings in relation to said mine by and on behalf of an alleged mining partnership in which plaintiff claims to be a member.
The judgment was for defendants, and the plaintiff appeals therefrom.
The plaintiff and six others who are made defendants herein entered into a written agreement on May 17, 1901, wherein the tract of land in question is described, and it is…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Pry Corp. of America v. LeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Kulawitz v. Pacific Woodenware & Paper Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Samson v. Nama Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Twining v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Bristol v. HersheyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.