Legal Opinion

Dudar v. Milef Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 29, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

This is an appeal by attorneys from an order denying to them and to a disbarred attorney, for whom they were substituted, a hen for services. Appeal is also taken from an order denying a motion for reargument.

The plaintiff, by George A. Colvin, attorney, brought an action for damages for personal injuries due to the alleged negligence of the defendant. Thereafter plaintiff substituted as his attorney one *280Rothbard on a contingent contract to pay him one-third the amount of any recovery. Subsequently Rothbard was disbarred (for his activities in so-called ambulance chasing) after he had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. In re RothbardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. In re ShayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re WoodworthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. Gary v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Mendelson v. GogolickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  4. In re WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  5. Rothbard v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API