Legal Opinion
Gary v. Cohen
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 18, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
This is a motion by the plaintiff to substitute his attorneys of record in this action, to fix the compensation of the old attorney and to compel delivery of the litigation papers to the new attorney. The plaintiff seeks to displace one Goldner and to place one Steinberg in his stead as such attorney.
The motion papers — pro and con — are woefully inadequate. It is impossible on the basis of the present submission to arrive at a complete determination — whether jurisdictional (which is an issue not raised by the parties) or on the merits (the operative factors of which were overlooked or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Robinson v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Goodrich v. . McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- In re SebringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Goldman v. Rafel Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- In Re WoodworthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Sympson v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- First National Bank of Cincinnati v. PepperCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Kourouvacilis v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal EmployeesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. KleppeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.