In re Shay
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
AppLroATroN of the district attorney of -the county o>f' New York to d'isbar the respondent, an attorney and eounseler of this court.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
The respondent was admitted to practice i-nt November,, 1900, •and has. continued, to» practice in the city of New Yorlt since, that time. The petition alleges that on the» 6>tk day of December, 1907, the respondent entered into, an agreement, with one Peck,, who, was not an attorney at law, whereby he, agreed to pay Peek a weekly •salary varying from, fifteen to twenty dollars a, week, in consideration of Peck’s, doing such work as the- respondent should) assign to ‘him», and more especially the-work, of'investigator in negligence cases- and preparing the same for trial; and in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- In re ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- In re the Proceedings for Disbarment of ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Brush v. . LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Buxton v. LietzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1912
- Dudar v. Milef Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- In re NewellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- In re O'NeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.