Legal Opinion

Rothbard v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On agreed statement of facts, judgment unanimously directed for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,133.33, without costs. When this agreement was made the plaintiff was still a lawyer and, therefore, the agreement which he made with the defendants did not violate section 274, subdivision 2, of the Penal Law in so far as it concerned compensation for services theretofore rendered by the plaintiff in this action. Even if plaintiff were a layman at the time the agreement was entered into, it would still be enforcible against the defendants. (Irwin v. Curie, 171 N. Y. 409, 414; Matter of Kelsey, 186…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Irwin v. . CurieNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Dudar v. Milef Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. In re KelseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mendelson v. GogolickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. In re Kanfer & KanterNew York District Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API